For all written material, the following rubric will be applied.
This rubric is based on one at Winona State University.
|  Item | Weight |  Outstanding |  Good | Acceptable | Poor |  Failing | 
|  Title and Abstract |  10%  | 
      The title is informative and reflects the content of the project and the abstract provides a concise summary of the area of study.  | 
      The title and abstract are relevant and offer details about the proposed are of study. | 
      The title and abstract provide a general description of the specialized area of study. | 
      The title and abstract provide a description of the area of study. | 
      No title or abstract | 
| Introduction | 10% | 
      The introduction is engaging, states the main topic and previews the structure of the paper. | 
      The introduction states the main topic and previews the structure of the paper. | 
      The introduction states the main topic but does not adequately preview the structure of the paper. | 
      There is no clear introduction or main topic and the structure of the paper is missing. | 
      Absent, no evidence | 
| Body | 10% | 
      Each paragraph has thoughtful supporting detail sentences that develop the main idea. | 
      Each paragraph has sufficient supporting detail sentences that develop the main idea. | 
      Each paragraph lacks supporting detail sentences.  | 
      Each paragraph fails to develop the main idea. | 
      Not applicable | 
| Organization and  Structural Development of the Idea | 10% | 
      Writer demonstrates logical and subtle sequencing of ideas through well-developed paragraphs; transitions are used to enhance organization. | 
      Paragraph development present but not perfected. | 
      Logical organization; organization of ideas not fully developed. | 
      No evidence of structure or organization. | 
      Not applicable | 
| Conclusion |  10% | 
      The conclusion is engaging and fully summarizes the material. | 
      The conclusion summarizes the material. | 
      The conclusion does not adequately summarize the material. | 
      Incomplete and/or unfocused. | 
      Absent | 
| Mechanics | 10% | 
      No errors in punctuation, capitalization and spelling. | 
      Almost no errors in punctuation, capitalization and spelling. | 
      Many errors in punctuation, capitalization and spelling. | 
      Numerous and distracting errors in punctuation, capitalization and spelling. | 
      Not applicable | 
| Usage |   10% | 
      No errors sentence structure and word usage. | 
      Almost no errors in sentence structure and word usage. | 
      Many errors in sentence structure and word usage. | 
      Numerous and distracting errors in sentence structure and word usage. | 
      Not applicable | 
|  Citation | 10% | 
      All cited works, both text and visual, are done in the correct format with no errors. | 
      Some cited works, both text and visual, are done in the correct format. | 
      Inconsistencies evident. | 
      Few cited works, both text and visual, are done in the correct format. | 
      Absent Not applicable  | 
| Bibliography | 10% | 
      Done in the correct format with no errors. | 
      Done in the correct format with few errors.  | 
      Done in the correct format with some errors.  | 
      Done in the correct format with many errors. 
      |  Absent | 
| Appearance |  10% | 
      Creative and attractive, cover,  graphics, clear organization, readable and neat, title page and table of contents | 
      Contains most of Outstanding criteria. | 
      Contains some of criteria for Outstanding; and/or poorly organized and difficult to read; lacking neatness. | 
      No organization, missing most of the criteria for outstanding. Difficult to read due to appearance. | 
      Absent structure and organization. |