Ethics
- this is section 1.4 of The Gift of Fire.
- You really should read it, I am not an ethicist.
- How do you make decisions when the matter of right or wrong is involved?
- This is not just restricted to computers and technology, but in general.
- Does it change for technology?
- Does it change in your professional life and your personal life?
- Ethics is the study of what it means to "do the right thing."
- Confucius: What you do not wish for yourself, do not do to others.
- You might have seen this one somewhere else too.
- Ethics assumes
- People are rational
- IE choices are made based on reason and logic.
- This is not always the case
- We even draw a distinction between a "crime of passion" and a premeditated crime.
- But we will assume for the most part that people are rational.
- People are free to make choices.
- Is this true?
- Do you have free will?
- Ethical rules
- Attempt to enhance human dignity, peace, happiness and well-being.
- Apply the same to everyone all of the time.
- Should respect that we are all unique and have our own personal desires and goals.
- Should inform our decision making when we have a choice to make.
- She notes that not all ethical systems follow these guidelines
- A large debate
- Are ethical rules natural or derived by man (god, demon, ...)?
- This is a long standing debate.
- She points out that behaving ethically is not a burden
- We are normally honest,
- we keep our promises,
- we do not steal,
- we do our work.
- She points out that violating these norms leads to problems
- IE if you are not honest, then no one trusts you.
- This applies professionally as well
- You will not have customers if you do not keep your business promises
- I believe this less
- Companies frequently behave immorally and do not pay a price.
- She continues that sometimes it is harder to do the right thing.
- But a definition of courage is to chose to to do the right thing in a difficult situation.
- Some different ethical systems.
- Deontological (Greek for obligation or duty)
- Emphasizes duty and following absolute rules.
- Do not lie
- There is no choice, you may not lie.
- Any time you do not lie, you are following this ethical dictate
- Any time you lie you are acting in an unethical way.
- Immanuel Kant is in this school.
- We should follow rules of behavior that we can universally apply to everyone.
- If you are not sure you should do something to someone else, consider if it is acceptable for them to do that to you.
- An example is: It is if you feel it is OK to cheat on your partner, then it is also acceptable for your partner to cheat on you.
- Logic and reason determines rules of ethical behavior
- Actions are intrinsically good because they follow from logic.
- It is good when we act rationally and evil when we act irrationally.
- We "know" it is bad to lie
- If everyone were to lie, society would not work.
- Or at least it would be a bad place.
- One must never treat people merely as a means to an ends, but rather as an ends themselves.
- What does this mean?
- It matters how you do thins, not just that they are done.
- It would be nice to just "give everyone an A"
- I would make it through the semester with very little struggle.
- Kant took an extreme position with ethical rules: You must follow them.
- Never lie
- Do I look fat?
- Someone tells you that they plan to kill Bob.
- They ask you where Bob is.
- You know.
- You tell them. You may not lie.
- I watched a video recently, Batman is a deontologist.
- He should kill the Joker.
- But it is wrong to kill.
- So the Joker lives to cause mayhem again.
- Utilitarianism
- The guiding principle is that moral acts increase happiness or "utility"
- But for the most people
- Taking a nap right now would make me happy, increase my utility.
- But it should impact the utility for all of you.
- Assuming I do a passing job of teaching
- And you believe that this is important information.
- John Stuart Mill is in this ethical camp.
- When considering an action consider all impacted by that action
- How many will it decrease utility for?
- How many will it increase utility for?
- Pick the wining group.
- Problems
- We might not know the consequences of the action and who it will impact.
- There is little/no respect for individual rights.
- A doctor has five patients who need a different organ.
- End of star trek II, "The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few, or the one", then SPOCK DIES!
Do 1.20 P 45
Natural Rights
- You should respect the natural rights of others
- Life,
- Liberty,
- Property,
- ? Happiness?
- People are free to make decisions as long as they don't violate others rights.
- We probably need to ignore things like law enforcement, punishment, ...
- John Locke
- We have a right to
- Ourselves
- Our labor
- The fruits of our labor
- If these are ignored, society will break down.
- Protection of property is a moral obligation.
- I clear land for farming
- If you take my land away, why would I ever do this again.
- If you don't take my land away, I will produce food, which will increase the overall utility
- Rights can be viewed in two ways
- Claim rights: You must provide for this right.
- Liberties: You must not prohibit this.
- I have the right to life
- Does this mean you may not deprive me of my life.
- Or that you must feed me, provide health care, shelter, ...
- Interpret freedom of speech under each each view of rights.
- Don't confuse these with privileges.
- Do you have the right to drive a car?
Look at 1.22
Virtuous Life
- Some view simply not hurting others as insufficient.
- You need to live a virtuous life.
- I assume that this is a life that is beneficial to others.
- How do you make these decisions?
- Example: Help is a soup kitchen or additional training.
Some Distinctions
- Right vs Wrong vs OK
- Trigger words, not good.
- View rather as
- ethically obligatory
- ethically prohibited
- ethically acceptable
- Wrong vs Harm
- Needlessly or carelessly causing harm is wrong.
- But sometimes you cause harm taking ethical actions.
- When you take a job that someone else wanted could be viewed as causing them harm.
- Producing a product that puts people out of work could be viewed as causing them harm.
- Neither action is wrong.
- Look at 1.35 and 1.36